Remedies for Copyright Infringement

Copyright infringement remains a significant issue across industries, with global piracy costing the U.S. economy up to $29.2 billion annually in lost revenues, according to the International Intellectual Property Alliance. When a creator’s exclusive rights are violated, legal remedies can help recover losses and stop further unauthorised use.

Remedies for infringement range from interlocutory injunctions that prevent ongoing exploitation to monetary awards for damages incurred. Depending on the severity of the violation, courts may also impose criminal penalties like fines or imprisonment.

This blog post explores key administrative, criminal and civil remedies for copyright infringement, providing an overview of how these legal measures work to enforce intellectual property rights and safeguard creators’ financial interests​.

What is Copyright Infringement?

Copyright infringement is the unauthorised use, reproduction, distribution, performance, or display of copyrighted material without the authorisation of the rights holder.

These exclusive rights typically cover creative works like literature, music, films, software, and more. The owner of these proprietary rights holds the legal authority to control the use, distribution, and reproduction of their work.

When an individual or organisation exploits such a work without permission—whether for personal or commercial gain—they violate the owner’s legal protection. This can include, but are not limited to:

• Making unauthorised copies of a book, movie, or music album
• Sharing copyrighted material online without permission, such as uploading a movie to a video-sharing platform or distributing a copyrighted e-book
• Publicly performing a copyrighted song or play without obtaining a license from the holder
• Creating derivative works, such as adaptations or translations, without the permission of the original creator.

In many cases, such actions breach the creator’s economic interests, often leading to financial losses for the original owner.

Infringement can range from intentional theft of exclusive rights to unintentional usage due to ignorance of intellectual law. Nonetheless, the consequences can include lawsuits, fines, or other legal actions.

What Remedies are Available for Infringement of Copyright?

Remedies for copyright infringement are detailed below:

Civil Remedies for Infringement

Cease and Desist Letters: Often the first step in addressing infringement, a cease and desist letter is a formal request for the infringer to stop using the copyrighted material and remove any infringing content.

Monetary Damages: Holders can seek compensation for their financial losses due to the infringement. There are two main types of monetary damages:

a. Actual Damages: These damages refer to the financial losses suffered by the copyright holder, such as lost profits or the amount the infringer profited from the unauthorised use of the copyrighted work.

b. Statutory Damages: Set by law, statutory damages can be awarded when it is difficult to determine actual damages. These damages can range from $750 to $30,000 per work infringed, or up to $150,000 for willful copyright infringement.

Injunctions: An injunction is a court order requiring the infringer to stop using the copyrighted material. Interlocutory Injunction can be temporary (preliminary) or permanent, depending on the circumstances.

Impounding and Disposal of Infringing Goods: Courts have the authority to impound and dispose of infringing goods, such as counterfeit copies or unauthorised reproductions.

Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In some cases, a copyright holder who prevails in a lawsuit may be awarded attorney’s fees and other costs associated with the litigation. This can serve as a deterrent to potential infringers and help alleviate the financial burden of pursuing legal action.

Criminal Remedies for Copyright Infringement

• Fines: In many countries, criminal infringement can result in significant fines. The amount of the fine may depend on the severity of the infringement, the number of works involved, and whether the infringement was committed for commercial gain.
• Imprisonment: Severe cases of copyright infringement can lead to imprisonment. The length of the prison sentence can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the infringement, such as whether it was a repeat offence or involved a large-scale distribution of copyrighted material.
• Seizure and Forfeiture: Law enforcement authorities may seize and forfeit infringing goods, equipment used to create or distribute the infringing material, and any profits gained from the infringement.
• Restitution: In some cases, a court may order the infringer to pay restitution to the rights holder as compensation for the losses suffered due to the infringement. Restitution may be ordered in addition to fines and other penalties.
• Probation: Instead of, or in addition to, imprisonment, a court may sentence an individual convicted of criminal copyright infringement to a period of probation. During this time, the individual is subject to certain conditions and restrictions, such as regular check-ins with a probation officer and refraining from engaging in further infringement activities.

Administrative Remedies

Administrative remedies involve approaching the Copyright Registrar to block the import of counterfeit copies, particularly when infringement occurs through illegal importation. In such cases, the confiscation of unauthorised materials is enforced by customs authorities.

Once seized, these infringing goods are delivered to the rightful owner of the intellectual work. This administrative procedure provides an effective non-judicial route to curb violations, ensuring that infringing items are kept out of the domestic market and protecting the original creator’s exclusive rights​.

Remedies for Copyright Infringement Across Globe

Austria

In Austria, the legal measures available for addressing copyright infringement encompass both civil and criminal remedies. Civil remedies include:

• The cessation of infringement through either preliminary or permanent injunctions.
• A demand for the removal of conditions leading to the infringement, which may involve the destruction of infringing copies.
• The requirement for the infringer to provide a detailed account of their actions.
• The public announcement of the court’s judgment.
• Financial compensation, which can take the form of adequate consideration for the use of the copyrighted material, damages for the infringement, and the surrender of profits gained from the infringement.

On the criminal side, remedies can include:

• Imposition of a monetary fine.
• Sentencing to imprisonment.

Additionally, measures to prevent the importation of infringing goods are available, with customs officers playing a role in enforcing these measures.

Brazil

In Brazil, the enforcement of copyright infringement laws encompasses both criminal and civil remedies. On the criminal side, penalties for copyright infringement can include both imprisonment and financial fines.

For civil actions, the remedies available to address infringement are comprehensive and include confiscating the infringing goods, halting their advertising and sale, imposing a daily fine for ongoing infringements, destroying the infringing items, and awarding damages, which may also cover moral damages.

Denmark

In Denmark, the legal framework for addressing copyright infringement provides for both equitable and reasonable compensation for unauthorised use, along with compensation for any additional losses or damages resulting from either negligent or intentional infringement.

One can also secure a court mandate for the destruction of products that infringe on copyright.

An initial measure may involve obtaining a preliminary court order for the seizure of both the infringing products and the equipment utilised in their production. Furthermore, copyright infringement can lead to criminal penalties.

India

In India, rights owners are afforded both civil and criminal remedies in cases of infringement.

Civil remedies include the right to seek an injunction, claim civil damages, or demand an account of profits, although statutory damages are not recognised under the Copyright Act of 1957.

Criminal sanctions for copyright infringement can involve imprisonment ranging from 6 months to 3 years, in addition to fines between INR 50,000 and INR 200,000.

For repeat offenders, the Copyright Act mandates more severe penalties.

Specifically, individuals convicted of a copyright offense for the second time or more are subject to a minimum imprisonment of 1 year, which may be extended up to 3 years, and a minimum fine of INR 100,000, which can go up to INR 200,000.

Ireland

In Ireland, rights holders have access to several key remedies when dealing with infringement, including:

• Injunctive relief to prevent further infringement,
• Compensation for damages incurred,
• An account of profits derived from the infringement, and/or
• The surrender, seizure, and destruction of materials that infringe on copyright.

Under certain conditions, infringement can also lead to criminal sanctions, such as fines and imprisonment.

Moreover, copyright owners are entitled to notify customs authorities about infringements, enabling them to be alert to counterfeit goods. This action helps in preventing the importation of materials that violate copyright laws.

Peru

In Peru, the National Copyright Office has the authority to enforce sanctions against copyright infringement, with the possibility of imposing fines up to USD 190,000 for violations.

Copyright infringement can also result in the obligation to compensate for damages and losses, the amount of which is to be decided by a judicial court.

Furthermore, copyright violations may attract criminal penalties, as governed by the national Criminal Law.

Copyright Infringement Cases and Their Legal Remedies

To illustrate the application of various remedies for copyright infringement, here are some real-world case studies:

Metallica vs. Napster (2000)

This case involved injunctive relief and financial repercussions. Metallica sued Napster for allowing users to share their music without authorisation, leading to widespread copyright infringement. The court issued an injunction against Napster, forcing it to halt its operations and block infringing content.

The legal pressure eventually led to Napster’s shutdown and bankruptcy. This case exemplifies the use of injunctions to stop ongoing infringement and the significant impact of digital copyright enforcement.

Unicolors vs. H&M (2021)

In this fabric design case, compensatory damages were at the center of the dispute. Unicolors successfully sued H&M for unauthorised use of its designs. However, the case brought attention to a technical aspect of copyright law: H&M challenged the validity of Unicolors’ copyright registration due to an administrative error. Although Unicolors won at first, H&M appealed.

The Supreme Court was asked to decide whether such registration mistakes could invalidate a copyright. This case reflects the complexity of seeking financial remedies, where technicalities in copyright registration can influence the outcome.

Art Rogers vs. Jeff Koons (1992)

Jeff Koons created a sculpture based on a photograph by Art Rogers without permission, claiming fair use as a defense.

The court rejected this defense and ruled in favor of Rogers, awarding damages to compensate for the unauthorised use of his work. This case highlights how compensatory damages are applied when fair use defenses fail​.

Gucci vs. Guess (2009)

Gucci sued Guess for copying its designs, seeking pecuniary damages for copyright and trademark violations. Although Gucci initially sought $221 million, the court awarded just $4.1 million.

The case showed how settlements or reduced damage awards can occur when a company has a history of sending cease-and-desist letters but lacks strong enforcement, weakening their claims.

Naruto (PETA) vs. Slater (2011)

This was the famous “Monkey Selfie” case, where PETA sued on behalf of a macaque, arguing that the monkey should own the copyright to a photograph it took. The court dismissed the case, ruling that copyright law does not extend to animals. This case shows the limitations of copyright law and how legal claims can sometimes challenge established frameworks.

These cases demonstrate a variety of legal remedies, including injunctions, compensatory damages, and settlements, all playing key roles in resolving copyright disputes.

Each case emphasises different strategies, from halting illegal activities to negotiating financial settlements, providing key insights into how copyright laws are enforced in practice.

5 Steps to Eliminate Copyright Infringement

1. Comprehending Copyright Infringement

Comprehending the law is important to protecting your intellectual property and minimising the risk of infringement. To familiarise yourself with the basics of copyright law, consider the following aspects:

Types of works protected: Copyright law protects original works of authorship, which can include literary works (e.g., books, articles, and scripts), musical works (e.g., songs and compositions), dramatic works (e.g., plays and screenplays), visual arts (e.g., paintings, sculptures, and photographs), audiovisual works (e.g., movies and videos), sound recordings, and software.

Copyright does not protect ideas, facts, methods, or systems, but it does protect the expression of those ideas in a tangible form.

Rights of copyright holders: Owners have exclusive rights to control the use of their works.

These rights typically include the ability to reproduce the work, distribute copies, publicly perform or display the work, and create derivative works based on the original.

Unauthorised use of copyrighted material may constitute infringement and lead to legal consequences.

Fair use: Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows for limited use of copyrighted material without obtaining permission from the copyright holder.

2. Register Your Work

Registering your work with the copyright office in your jurisdiction is a critical step in safeguarding your intellectual property.

While copyright protection is automatic upon the creation of an original work in a tangible form, registration offers several legal benefits:

Ability to sue for infringement: In many jurisdictions, such as the United States, you must register your work with the copyright office before you can file a lawsuit against someone for infringement.

Seeking statutory damages: If you have registered your work, you may be eligible to seek statutory damages in a copyright infringement lawsuit.

Statutory damages are predetermined amounts set by law that can be awarded when it is difficult to determine actual damages or lost profits.

Public notice of copyright ownership: Registration serves as a public record of your claim to copyright ownership. This can be beneficial in deterring potential infringers and supporting your case in any legal disputes.

When others are aware of your registration, they are less likely to infringe on your work or challenge your ownership.

Easier to transfer or license rights: If you plan to sell, transfer, or license your work, having a copyright registration can simplify the process and provide potential buyers or licensees with the assurance that you hold the necessary rights to the work.

Presumption of validity: In some jurisdictions, registering your work with the copyright office creates a presumption of validity for your copyright claim.

This can be helpful if you need to prove your ownership or the originality of your work in court, as the burden of proof shifts to the alleged infringer to show that your copyright is invalid.

3. Use Copyright Notices

Elements of a copyright notice: A typical copyright notice consists of three elements:

The copyright symbol (©) or the word “Copyright.”

The year of the first publication of the work.

The name of the copyright owner (which can be an individual, group, or organisation). An example of a proper copyright notice is: “© 2023 John Doe. All Rights Reserved.”

Placement of the notice: Place the copyright notice in a prominent and visible location on your work. For printed materials, such as books or articles, the notice is typically displayed on the first few pages or the back cover.

Adapt the notice for different media: The format and presentation of a copyright notice may need to be adapted to suit the specific medium of your work.

Additional statements: You may also include additional statements in your copyright notice to clarify the scope of your rights or provide guidance on permitted uses.

Update notices as needed: If you make significant changes to your work, such as a new edition or substantial revisions, update the copyright notice to reflect the year of the most recent publication.

4. Monitor Your Work

Set up Google Alerts: Google Alerts is a free tool that allows you to track mentions of specific keywords or phrases on the internet. Set up alerts using your name, the title of your work, or unique phrases from your content.

Use reverse image search: If your work includes visual elements such as images or photographs, use reverse image search tools like Google Images or TinEye to find instances where your images are used online.

These tools allow you to upload or enter the URL of your image and search the web for matching or similar images.

Monitor social media: Keep an eye on social media platforms for mentions of your work or instances of unauthorised sharing.

Track content with watermarking: Consider adding digital watermarks to your work, which can be visible or invisible identifiers embedded in your content.

Watermarks can help you trace unauthorised uses of your work and provide evidence of ownership in case of infringement disputes.

Utilise plagiarism detection tools: Use plagiarism detection software like Bytescare to scan the web for instances of your work being copied without permission.

5. Alternative Licensing

Clarity of terms: By adopting a Creative Commons license or another alternative licensing model, you clearly outline the terms and conditions under which your work can be used.

This helps potential users comprehend what is permitted and what constitutes infringement, reducing the chances of unintentional violations.

Control over usage: Alternative licenses allow you to maintain control over your work by specifying the types of uses you allow.

For example, you can decide if your work can be used for commercial purposes, if it can be modified, and if so, to what extent. You can also require that users provide proper attribution when using your work.

Encouraging sharing and collaboration: By granting specific permissions through alternative licenses, you encourage the legal sharing, distribution, and reuse of your work.

This can lead to increased exposure, collaboration, and innovation, benefiting both you as the creator and the wider community.

What’s Next?

Copyright infringement triggers various types of remedies designed to protect the ownership rights of creators.

Remedies may include interlocutory relief to prevent ongoing infringement, award of damages for the losses suffered, or additional damages if the infringement results in significant financial gain for the infringer. Courts may also order monetary payment as compensation, safeguarding both economic rights and moral rights of the original creator.

In cases where the infringer seeks commercial advantage, copyright law provides strong provisions of rule to ensure exclusive ownership is respected. Defenses like fair dealing may apply in limited situations, but infringers often face legal consequences.

Whether facing alleged infringement of a novel, cinematographic film, or any copyrighted work, the Bytescare Digital Protection Service empowers creators to protect their work and combat infringement.

Contact us today to learn more and safeguard your creative endeavors.

FAQs