In the digital age, where sharing information and creative works is commonplace, the question arises: Is it copyright infringement if you give credit?

While giving credit is seen as an ethical practice, it does not automatically provide legal immunity.

Copyright law grants exclusive rights to creators, protecting their works from unauthorised use.

Though giving credit demonstrates respect, it does not authorise the use of copyrighted material.

A lot of people think that simply giving attribution to the content architect may provide immunity from violation. However, it is a common misconception that prevails among many people.

The focus of this article is whether giving credit to the original creator excuses copyright infringement.

By exploring the legal framework, delving into the concept of fair use, and addressing common misconceptions, we hope to provide clarity on whether giving credit truly excuses infringement.

Is it Copyright Infringement if You Give Credit?

The act of giving credit alone does not necessarily absolve someone from the risk of copyright infringement.

While giving credit is generally considered an ethical practice, it does not automatically grant legal permission to use someone else’s copyrighted material.

Copyright infringement occurs when someone uses, copies, or distributes copyrighted material without the explicit authorisation of the copyright owner.

Providing attribution or credit to the original creator is a way of acknowledging their work, but it does not substitute for obtaining proper permits or licenses.

To illustrate this, let’s consider an example.

Suppose there is a photographer named Miss X who takes a stunning photograph of a sunset. X owns the copyright to this individual image, giving her the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display it.

Now, imagine that a blogger Miss Y wants to use X’s photograph on her blog. Y believes that as long as she credits X as the photographer, it would be permissible.

However, without seeking explicit permission or obtaining a license from X, Miss Y would still be infringing on Miss X’s copyright, even if she provides proper attribution.

In this scenario, giving copyright credit to X does not automatically grant Y the right to use the photograph.

To use the image legally, Y would need to obtain permission from X, which might involve obtaining a license or coming to a mutual agreement.

While giving credit is a positive practice that acknowledges the efforts of creators, it is crucial to understand that copyright infringement is determined by the violation of intellectual property rights, regardless of attribution.

To ensure copyright compliance, it is essential to obtain proper authorisation or create original content that does not infringe on the rights of others.

Must Read  How to Get a Copyright License: A Comprehensive Guide

When Does Copyright Infringement Occur?

Copyright infringement occurs when someone uses, copies, or distributes someone else’s original work without permission from the individual creator or without a valid legal basis.

This can include various forms of creative works such as books, music, films, photographs, artwork, and more.

Why Giving Credit Alone May Not Be Sufficient?

While giving credit is generally considered a positive practice in acknowledging the original creator of a work, there are certain situations where it may actually be worse or have negative consequences.

Here are a few reasons why giving credit alone may not be sufficient or could potentially exacerbate certain issues:

  1. Unauthorised Use: Giving credit does not grant permission to use copyrighted material. Even if someone provides attribution, using someone else’s work without their explicit permission or a valid legal basis still constitutes copyright infringement. Simply acknowledging the creator does not absolve the potential infringer of their legal responsibilities.
  2. Misleading Attribution: In some cases, providing credit incorrectly or inaccurately can lead to confusion or misrepresentation. If someone attributes a work to a specific creator without proper verification, it can cause reputational damage to the actual creator or result in false associations.
  3. Unintentional Plagiarism: Crediting the source of a work does not eliminate the risk of unintentional plagiarism. If someone copies or closely mimics an original content while giving credit, they may still be infringing on the original creator’s rights. Plagiarism involves using someone else’s work without proper acknowledgment, but it can still occur even if credit is given.
  4. Inadequate Compensation: While giving credit acknowledges the creator’s contribution, it does not necessarily provide them with appropriate compensation. In some cases, individuals or organisations may use the copyrighted content without consent, solely relying on giving credit as a way to avoid paying for the use of the work. This can undermine the creator’s ability to earn a living from their piece of content.

It’s important to note that copyright laws and practices vary across jurisdictions, and the specific circumstances of each case can influence legal and ethical considerations.

While giving credit is a valuable ethical principle, it is not a substitute for obtaining proper permissions, and licenses or adhering to the legal requirements for using copyrighted material.

Situations Where Giving Credit May Not Be Enough

While giving credit is generally a positive practice, there are situations where it may not be sufficient or where additional actions are needed.

Here are some scenarios where giving credit alone may not be enough:

  1. Unauthorised Use: Giving credit does not grant permission to use copyrighted material. If someone uses someone else’s work without explicit permission, even with attribution, it can still be considered copyright infringement.
  2. Commercial Use: Simply giving credit is often inadequate for commercial use. If someone intends to profit from the use of licensed material, they generally need proper licensing or permissions beyond attribution.
  3. Moral Rights: Attribution may not address moral rights, which are non-economic rights held by creators to protect the integrity and reputation of their work. Some creators may have specific requirements or restrictions on how their work is used, even if they are credited.
  4. Contractual Agreements: Giving credit may not fulfill contractual obligations. If there are specific agreements in place between the individual creator and user of the work, those terms need to be followed, and attribution alone may not be enough.
  5. Derivative Works: Creating derivative works, such as adaptations or remixes, often requires more than just attribution. Obtaining proper permissions or licenses is necessary in such cases.
  6. Fair Use Misinterpretation: Claiming “fair use” or “fair dealing” as a defense for using copyrighted material without permission requires meeting specific legal criteria, such as using the material for criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, or research. Simply giving credit is not enough to automatically qualify as fair use.
Must Read  Google Maps Copyright Infringement

It’s important to recognise that the requirements for the lawful use of licensed material extend beyond giving credit.

The Consequences of Attribution on the Creative Economy

When individuals, businesses, or websites make the choice to utilise copyrighted work without obtaining proper permission or paying for the rights, it has far-reaching consequences on the creative economy.

This behavior not only breaches ethical standards but also violates the legal rights of the original creators, undermining their ability to earn a livelihood from their creative efforts.

In essence, it can be considered a form of theft.

Musicians, writers, graphic designers, videographers, and other creative professionals have valid reasons for seeking financial gain from their creative works.

By disregarding their intellectual property rights, unauthorised use hampers their ability to monetise their talents and invest in future endeavors.

To uphold fairness and integrity, it is crucial for all forms of digital content to be appropriately licensed.

This includes accurately crediting or compensating individuals when their work is utilised for financial gain by others.

By ensuring proper licensing and attribution, the creative economy can thrive, encouraging innovation and providing creators with the recognition and financial support they deserve.


Proper attribution is a fundamental aspect of the ethical use of licensed material, but it alone does not absolve us from copyright claims.

While it demonstrates respect for creators, it is essential to understand that permission from the copyright holder is generally required for use.

Misconceptions surrounding attribution, fair use, and legal protection must be dispelled.

To navigate copyright law responsibly, seeking legal advice from copyright experts, adhering to fair use guidelines, and obtaining permissions when necessary are crucial.

Let us foster a culture that values creators’ rights, respects copyright policy, and promotes responsible and lawful use of creative works in the digital age.


What are the common misconceptions about attribution?

Misconceptions about attribution include thinking it grants permission to use copyrighted material, that it automatically qualifies as fair use, and that it provides protection from the claims of copyright infringement.

Some also believe it prevents plagiarism entirely.

While attribution is important, it doesn’t replace the need for permission, adherence to fair use guidelines, or a proper understanding of the application of copyright law.

Must Read  Innocent Copyright Infringement

It should be seen as an ethical practice, but not a comprehensive solution to legal and ethical considerations.

Can giving credit protect me from legal consequences?

Giving copyright credit is an ethical practice, but it does not provide legal protection against the risk of copyright infringement.

Permission from the copyright owner is necessary to ensure compliance with the law.

How fair use is different from attribution?

Fair use allows the usage of limited amounts of copyright-protected material without permission, while attribution is giving credit to the original creator.

Fair use, a defense to copyright infringement, considers factors like purpose, nature, the amount used, and the potential market impact.

Attribution acknowledges authorship but isn’t always required by law. While they can overlap, attribution alone doesn’t make a use fair or exempt from infringement.

Understanding both concepts is crucial for the responsible use of licensed material.

What are the legal consequences of Copyright Infringement?

Infringement of copyright can have severe legal consequences, including financial penalties, injunctions, and damage to one’s reputation.

Copyright owners have the right to send a proper copyright notice, pursue legal action and seek compensation from infringers for the unauthorised use of their online material.

Even if credit is given, it does not protect against potential legal action if the use exceeds the boundaries of fair use or lacks proper authorisation.