Are Trade Secrets Cheaper than Patents?

Are trade secrets cheaper than patents?

In the competitive landscape of business and innovation, companies often find themselves at a crossroads when deciding how best to protect their intellectual property. Two primary avenues stand out: trade secrets and license.

Each has its own set of advantages, legal protections, and costs associated with securing and maintaining the rights. But a question that frequently surfaces in boardrooms and among entrepreneurs is: Are trade secrets cheaper than licenses?

This blog post delves into the intricacies of trade secrets and licenses, comparing their costs, benefits, and suitability for different types of innovations and business strategies.

We’ll explore the financial implications of opting for one over the other, including the upfront costs, ongoing expenses, and the potential for long-term value and protection.

Join us as we unravel the complexities behind the decision to keep an innovation under wraps as a trade secret or to disclose it to the world in exchange for patent protection.

What are Trade Secrets?

Trade secrets are a form of intellectual property (IP) rights that encompass confidential information which provides a business with a competitive edge.

This information can include formulas, practices, designs, instruments, patterns, or compilations of information that are not known by others and by which a business can obtain an economic advantage over competitors or customers.

In essence, trade secrets are secrets that are integral to a company’s success.

Key characteristics of trade secrets include:

• Not Generally Known: The information must not be generally known to the public or to other companies within the same industry.
• Economic Value: The secret must derive economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use.
• Reasonable Steps to Keep Secret: The company must take reasonable measures to keep the information secret. This often involves confidentiality agreements with employees and business partners, secure storage of information, and other security measures.

Further Reading: Are Emojis Trademarked?

What is the Difference Between Trade Secrets and Patents?

Trade secrets and licenses represent two fundamental but distinct forms of intellectual property protection, each catering to different types of information and offering unique advantages and limitations.

Understanding the differences between these two can help businesses make informed decisions about how best to protect their innovations. Here’s a breakdown of the key distinctions:

Nature of Protection

• Trade Secrets: Protect confidential business information that provides a company with a competitive edge. This includes formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, patterns, or any information that has independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by others. The protection of trade secrets does not require registration or disclosure of the information to the public.
• Patents: Protect inventions that are novel, non-obvious, and useful. This includes processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter. Patents require a detailed public disclosure of the invention and, once granted, provide the patent holder with the exclusive right to use, sell, and manufacture the invention for a limited period, typically 20 years from the filing date.

Duration of Protection

• Trade Secrets: The protection lasts as long as the information remains secret and maintains its value from being confidential. There is no formal expiration for trade secret protection.
• Patents: Provide protection for a limited period, after which the patented invention enters the public domain. For most inventions, this period is 20 years from the filing date of the patent application.

Scope of Protection

• Trade Secrets: The protection is limited to unauthorised use or disclosure of the confidential information. It does not protect against independent discovery or reverse engineering.
• Patents: Offer protection against others making, using, selling, or importing the patented invention without permission, regardless of whether they independently developed the invention or not.

Cost and Procedure

• Trade Secrets: There are no registration costs associated with trade secret protection, but companies must incur costs to maintain secrecy, such as implementing security measures and drafting non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
• Patents: Obtaining a patent involves significant costs, including filing fees, examination fees, and maintenance fees over the life of the patent. The process also requires a detailed application that discloses the invention to the public.

Enforcement

• Trade Secrets: Enforcement relies on the ability to prove that the information was kept secret, had economic value because it was secret, and that reasonable steps were taken to maintain its secrecy. Legal action can be taken against those who breach confidentiality agreements or otherwise improperly acquire or disclose the trade secret.
• Patents: Patent holders can take legal action against infringers to stop unauthorised use and to seek damages. The clarity of patent rights can make enforcement more straightforward compared to trade secrets.

Are Trade Secrets Cheaper than Patents?

When comparing the cost of protecting intellectual property through trade secrets versus patents, it’s generally accurate to say that trade secrets can be cheaper than licenses, especially in the short term.

This cost-effectiveness is due to several factors inherent to the nature of each type of protection. Here’s a breakdown of why trade secrets might be considered cheaper:

Initial Costs

• Trade Secrets: There are no registration or filing fees associated with maintaining a trade secret because it does not require formal registration with a government body. The primary costs are related to internal measures to keep the information confidential, such as secure information storage, training employees, and drafting non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
• Patents: Obtaining a patent involves significant upfront costs, including filing fees, attorney fees, and often, the costs associated with a detailed application process. This process can take years and requires disclosing the invention publicly.

Maintenance Costs

• Trade Secrets: The ongoing costs of maintaining a trade secret include measures to ensure the information remains secure and confidential. These costs can vary widely depending on the nature of the secret and the size of the company but generally involve internal practices rather than fees to external entities.
• Patents: After a patent is granted, the patent holder must pay maintenance fees to keep the patent in force. These fees can increase over time and can represent a substantial financial commitment over the life of a patent, typically 20 years.

Enforcement Costs

• Trade Secrets: If a trade secret is misappropriated, the cost of legal action to enforce rights and seek damages can be significant. However, these costs are incurred reactively, only if the trade secret is compromised.
• Patents: Patent enforcement also involves legal costs, particularly if the patent holder needs to sue for infringement. However, because licenses provide clear documentation of the holder’s rights, the path to enforcement can sometimes be more straightforward than proving misappropriation of a trade secret.

Long-term Considerations

While trade secrets can be cheaper initially and do not involve maintenance fees, they carry the risk of being independently discovered or reverse-engineered.

Once a trade secret is out, its protection vanishes, potentially leaving a company without recourse.

In contrast, licenses provide a time-limited monopoly on the invention, even if others independently discover the same invention during the patent’s term.

Further Reading: Alibaba Trademark Infringement

Conclusion

In conclusion, trade secrets often present a more cost-effective alternative to licenses for protecting intellectual property, primarily due to the absence of registration, filing, and maintenance fees associated with patent protection.

The costs associated with trade secrets generally revolve around internal measures to safeguard confidentiality, such as securing proprietary information and drafting non-disclosure agreements.

However, while trade secrets can be cheaper in the short term and potentially offer indefinite protection, they come with their own set of risks, including vulnerability to independent discovery or reverse engineering.

On the other hand, licenses provide a clear, time-limited monopoly on an invention but require significant financial investment and public disclosure.

The decision between opting for trade secret protection or patenting should, therefore, consider not just the cost implications but also the nature of the invention, the competitive environment, and the strategic goals of the business.

Balancing these factors can help companies effectively protect their innovations while aligning with their overall business objectives.

Are you scared of copyright and piracy issues? Book a demo with experts to discuss the effective solutions for your brand.

Frequently Asked Questions